Peacefully and Politely Placing Political Putridness on the Compost Heap of History

Turning the politically putrid into something useful is quite easy with imagination and a little help from science and history.

What is your acquaintance with decomposition and composting?

How do you tell the difference between a beneficial organism and a corrupt politician?

How do you tell the difference between a quality news service and a crappy one?

How do you tell the difference between Civility World and a dead world?

If you are unfamiliar with the Civility Party of Australia, welcome.


 

What do you usually do with political manure?

What have you discovered about the ash heap of history

As possibilities for the future should, ideally, be adequately informed by history and science, the Civility Party of Australia acknowledges that there has already been more than enough ash produced by incompetent politicians and other incautious persons, particularly during droughts and heatwaves.

Much effort must be made to improve the Constitution of Australia.

Much effort must also be made to improve the health of agricultural land in Australia, and the quality fresh water resources.

Such efforts are at the heart of a peaceful and polite approach to economics as well as politics.

All policies of the Civility Party of Australia are purposeful policies.

Peacefully and politely placing political putridness on the compost heap of history is a shared responsibility, with or without suitable support from the media.

There are few reputable muckraking journalists nowadays.

And there are far too many politicians and political staffers with reputations as rakes and fakes.

 

 

The Civility Party makes all its decisions on the basis of appropriate knowledge.

Such decision-making informs practical approaches to providing support, through science and history.

How are you attempting to improve public interest journalism as a peaceful and polite practice?

Comments